
While esports is an industry itself, one some claim is worth over $1 billion, it’s also a hotbed of trends. From athletes and musicians rushing to invest in teams to even fast-food companies launching channels to accommodate gamers, it’s trendy to be involved with an industry people believe will be the next big thing. The new trend involves cryptocurrency.
To be fair to cryptocurrency, that whole industry has undergone a big boom itself — even far surpassing the financial status of esports, despite all of the venture capital and celebrity money that have been pumped into it over the past few years. The emergence of NFTs, a technology that assigns a unique ledger to online assets like images and videos, seemed to take over the entirety of the internet earlier in 2021. Many believe that this tech will be behind the ‘ownership era’ of the web, and some are already banking on it helping to evolve gaming itself. As crypto blew up and companies specializing in the technology received unbelievable valuations and investment, esports organizations and tournament organizers have been among the beneficiaries. The headline deal to demonstrate this trend, which has only strengthened since, was a ten-year naming sponsorship agreement between TSM and exchange platform FTX worth $210m.

While the values of these deals weren’t disclosed — as is the norm in esports — Astralis, who are a household name in Denmark, claimed that it was the “largest partnership deal [they] have entered to date.” This is very telling considering they’re already entered agreements with huge companies like Garmin, Audi, hummel, Logitech, and HP. Other recent examples of the convergence of crypto and esports include FTX and LCS, Coinbase with BIG, Evil Geniuses, ESL, and BLAST, Uniswap and Team Secret, NBX and Nordavind, Rally and Gen.G, and Binance and OG. Oh, and of course we’ve had Socios partner with esports orgs to offer “fan tokens” for quite some time.
Are cryptocurrency sponsors bad for esports?
We need to look at why crypto companies are flocking to esports before judging whether their intentions are good or not, and whether the fact it’s happening is positive or negative. According to Newzoo, esports will have an audience of 474m people in 2021 and many of them are deemed to be young adults. Fifty-seven percent of cryptocurrency bought in 2020, according to Forbes, was by millennials (ages 26-40). There’s a lot of potential crossover here. The same reason helps to explain why sports properties and athletes have rushed to get involved: they want to appeal to young people with disposable income. I’d bet esports organizations, especially after the past 18 months or so, with lockdowns rendering offline competition almost impossible, are keener than ever to consider big-money offers regardless of the companies they come from. Esports is still an industry where investment and building infrastructure are key, with potential financial and mainstream cultural success to follow in years to come, so multi-million-dollar sponsorship offers are always going to be welcomed, whether that be from crypto exchanges, gambling firms, or even Saudi Arabian smart cities.

There are certainly questions of sustainability yet to be answered. While some currencies and technologies have existed for a while, more and more are popping up on what appears to be a daily basis and there’s no doubt in my mind that only a small percentage will ever be successful, sustainable, and devised in a way that negates any nefarious plotting from the ‘founders’. Let’s put the sustainability comment into context. TSM are getting $21m a year, for 10 years, from FTX. Despite the exchange recently being valued at $18b, there are no guarantees that they will last the term. The same goes for TSM, mind you. Regardless, what if TSM are operating under the assumption that they’ll see all $210m and make some big investments (whether into infrastructure or acquiring other companies), and then FTX folds one day? What if FTX is involved in a legal matter that tarnishes their reputation as a fair, reliable exchange and TSM can’t afford to back out of their deal? That’s negative brand association for potentially many years to come.
